America in The Afghanistan War: A Hero or A Hypocrite?

June 22, 2022

“O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave

O’er the land of the free

And the home of the brave?”

“The Star-Spangled Banner” – National Anthem of The United States

The United States of America is a country well-known as a champion of courage, freedom, peace, and prosperity. In particular, it is a country that has a reputation for global leadership, liberal international order, and advocacy for human rights. The U.S. “tends to be the first or most important country for identifying or framing international issues, taking action to address those issues,” and “setting an example for other countries to follow” (CRS).

The mission of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan was in accordance with its foreign policy to propagate the same values of freedom and human rights across the globe. The U.S. administration was determined to thwart the tyrannical Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The American soldiers spent 20 long years in warfare, risking their lives to uphold this noble dream. In August 2021, when the U.S. forces evacuated Afghanistan, giving way to the Taliban to regain control of the country, the U.S. government remained concerned for the welfare of Afghan civilians and promised its support for a peaceful establishment of a civilian government in Afghanistan. They also promised America as a safe haven for the Afghans who were targeted by the Taliban.

In the book Sparks like Stars, a shaggy-haired American man asks, “Don’t you think we’ve done enough to clean up these third world countries?… We took the Taliban out for them. They should be responsible for fixing their own problems now” (279). As I contemplated these statements, my mind raced to grasp the deep irony embedded in them. The questions rampant in my brain were: Isn’t it obvious that the U.S. is mostly at fault for the desperate state of affairs currently in Afghanistan? Shouldn’t the U.S. be held accountable for the loss of thousands of civilian lives with its invasion of Afghanistan? Their participation in the Afghanistan War should not be classified as a heroic act out of altruism, but rather as a show of military power and interference in the sovereignty of another country.

Afghanistan is a multi-ethnic country located along the trade routes bridging Asia to Europe and the Middle East. It has long been a clashing point of other empires that seek to win the country over for its geographical economic gains (“Afghanistan”). The country itself has never been able to unite against invasive forces; however, the independent resilience of each Afghan made up for it. In 1992, the Mujahideen differed on the future of Afghanistan. Eventually, the Taliban rose to power in 1995 with a promise to establish peace after decades of unrest (Desk). They claimed to uphold traditional Islamic values, but they propagated extreme interpretations of Islamic theology that suited their authority and executed them on the Afghan population, like barring women from their education rights (Ibrahim).  

In 2000, the U.S. demanded that Bin Laden be handed over for trial against terrorist acts, but the Taliban refused. Following the Taliban’s continued refusal to extradite Bin Laden after he was accused of initiating the 9/11 attack in 2001, the U.S. and British forces launched attacks against Afghanistan. In 2017, the U.S. military loosened its airstrike rules, resulting in an increase in civilian casualties. Over the four years of Trump’s administration, the number of innocent civilians killed by America’s airstrikes increased by 330%. As of April 2021, 71,000 of the 241,000 killed by all parties in Afghanistan were civilians (“Afghan Civilians”). Innocent Afghan civilians were caught in the crossfire as these forces claimed to bomb the military bases of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. Ironically, most of the Western leaders and public justified the civilian casualties in consideration of the noble intentions of American soldiers to erase terrorism. 

The propaganda that the West is a saviour to the East has been rather systematic in the global narrative, As Clay says on page 278, “History books are sanitized, abbreviated versions of the story. One guy assumes power, another loses it. But the soldiers and civilians are living this war and suffering the losses.” Western media portray the U.S. as a heroic country and a self-proclaimed leader to establish peace and prosperity in foreign countries. But how do we then reconcile this claim against the 90% of the 5000 Afghan refugees who were refused refugee status in America without apparent reason (“U.S. Is Rejecting over 90% of Afghans Seeking to Enter the Country on Humanitarian Grounds”)? What about the ‘justified’ American airstrike that killed 10 innocent people on August 29, 2021, seven of whom were young children (Savage)? 

In the summer of 2021, 76,000 Afghan refugees fleeing from the Taliban’s control were accepted by the U.S., only to be living in poverty (NBCNews). For months, these refugees stood in long lines for food and clothing, and they had little privacy in the camps. They were provided with minimal assistance; local resettlement agencies offered assistance for housing and basic necessities that lasted for barely three months. This support included an insufficient amount of $1,200 per person as federal ‘welcome money’ which was only able to cover limited daily essentials while the jobless evacuees were left to find ways to pay for rent (Mansoor). It also took at least six months for the Afghan refugees to benefit from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, a federal program once known as “food stamps”. Due to the lack of education, the resettled Afghans are also deprived of a clear path toward U.S. citizenship, a status that would solve many of their financial issues (NBCNews). 

The U.S. has a long list of countries it has corrupted for its own political favour: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq are just a few examples in recent history. The U.S. gets involved in such countries for political power and other gains; it’s never been entirely about justice or welfare. It is time that powerful countries like the U.S. be held responsible for the blood they have continued to shed in third-world countries. “People say ‘third world’ and think it just means countries without the internet and paved roads. But ‘third world’ is Cold War terminology. NATO countries are the first world and the Communist bloc is the second world. The third world was where those two clashed. So the mess in Afghanistan is actually a first and second world problem” (278). The U.S. has to take accountability for the losses they inflicted upon the Afghans and stop pulling the ‘heroic’ card each time of war. The U.S. has to provide more Afghan refugees with the safe haven they were promised; the American administration has to truly live up to the anthem they very proudly sing by granting the brave Afghan civilians a free life in the country of that star-spangled banner.

Reflective Analysis of ‘The Screaming Staircase’

The Screaming Staircase by Jonathan Stroud is the first installment of a thrilling paranormal series, Lockwood & Co. that is targeted towards children in middle school. In the book, England is struck with an epidemic of ghosts that appear at night and are only visible to children who have psychic senses called “Talents”. Consequently, psychic investigative agencies hire these talented kids to recognize any paranormal activity and aid in investigations. Lucy Carlyle, a 14-year-old girl with highly sensitive psychic abilities, is hired by Lockwood & Co, a private agency run by an orphaned teen and his friend. Contrary to other agencies which require an adult supervisor at all times, the trio—Lucy, Lockwood, and George—take pride in their independence and investigate cases alone, one of them being a murder case in which they swiftly destroy the victim’s ghost and eventually identify the murderer. However, in doing so, they accidentally burn down the house at the crime scene, for which they owe €60,000. Lockwood & Co. begins to seek more customers to pay their debt, and they become recognized in the region despite the continuous ridicule they receive for their juvenile age and non-normative practices, much to the disdain of their popular rival agencies, Fittes and Rotwell. The counter-hegemonic ideologies revealed in The Screaming Staircase, along with reception theory, explain why this media text resonates deeply with young teenagers more than adults who may share an equal—or even more—interest in paranormal thrillers.

The journey of Stroud’s main characters, Lucy, Lockwood, and George, to prosperity, despite defying adults and authority, constructs the counter-hegemonic idea that children are capable of becoming successful without adult guidance or management. This is counter-hegemonic because the dominant ideology in the world is that children are required to stay under the constant protection of experienced adults who know how to react in any emergency, especially in dangerous circumstances like ghost-hunting. The world revolves around adults holding authority over children and guiding them by using their own experiences, as indicated by the social and legal rules in Canada that deem a child under the care of a guardian for eighteen years (“Do I Need a Legal Guardian”). Growing up, the ideology I was taught in school and at home also centred around the same premise of obeying the elderly and trusting their instincts, for they always know what is best for us as inexperienced children whose prefrontal cortices are still undeveloped. However, the book’s plot challenges this principle, as the three kids believe that “adults just get in the way” (Stroud 14) of their explorations and that they are completely useless in psychic investigations because their “senses had long ago grown dulled” (52), indicating that their insights cannot be trusted. This counter-hegemonic idea of children not needing an adult to regulate their activity because they hinder their aspirations appeals to a young audience, as they recognize the freedom and individuality they are often deprived of due to authoritative figures and their strict rules. Hence, their acceptance of Stroud’s intended message results in many young readers having a dominant reading of the text, which is also fueled by the story’s approval of teenage behaviours.

When I first read “The Screaming Staircase” in early high school, I also interpreted it as a dominant reading because I agreed with Stroud’s unique representation of children. In his paranormal world, kids’ instincts are considered a vital component to the salvation of the country, and kids are even preferred as investigative employees over adults, causing “whole generations of children, like [Lucy], [to find] themselves becoming part of the front line” (48). To appeal to children even further, Stroud demonstrates how teenage traits like impulsivity and seeking validation, which are traditionally labelled as immature behaviour, can in fact yield positive results. For instance, Lucy refuses to delay the murder case for just one night even though she and Lockwood’s lives are endangered, simply because the owner of the haunted house “thinks [they’re] too young” and that if they do not “crack the case by tomorrow, she’ll take [them] off it and put Fittes or Rotwell’s on the job” (32). The kids’ determination to prove their strength and gain recognition supersedes their self-preservation, mimicking the typical adolescent mindset I also had when I would forcefully lift heavy objects to display my strength, knowing that I would pull a muscle, or when I would swallow incredibly spicy food to prove my tolerance but ended up with fiery ears and ulcers.Segue unclear

Although this adolescent trait of acting impulsively to gain validation is typically considered unsensible behaviour, Lockwood & Co.’s constant eagerness to prove themselves in society pushes them to complete tasks briskly, resulting in the prestige of the young agency. In fact, Lucy reflects that ever “since [they’d] begun [their] explorations, [her] confidence had slowly risen… [They’d] been careful, rigorous, even competent,” and it all “showed [her] what Lockwood & Co. might one day become” (207). Their hastiness and resolve to prove their talents and independence despite their juvenile age make them “competent” and encourage them forward. Hence, when I read this book as a fourteen-year-old, I greatly admired Lucy and her colleagues, and I agreed with Stroud’s representation of adolescent traits as tools to succeed in the teenage phase. His acceptance of my age-appropriate behaviours acknowledged me for who I naturally was. However, my reception of the book differs now, for my age has developed, and I no longer share many adolescent behaviours with Lucy, Lockwood, and George.Good segue

Rereading The Screaming Staircase while nearing legal adulthood changed my former dominant reading of the book into a negotiated one, for I now acknowledge the grave consequences of the sophomoric behaviour praised in the book. To be specific, Lockwood & Co.’s unfortunate burning of the house is considered a mild inconvenience because, as Lockwood puts it, “[the] house will have burned down, but at least it’s ghost-free” (43). The kids do not realize that their impulsivity results in the loss of a person’s house, and they believe that they will “totally offset the fact [that they] burned that woman’s house down” by simply “uncover[ing] the murderer and get[ting] justice for the girl” (125), who was the ghostly victim. This means earning €60,000 within a month, which, realistically, is not achievable. Because of this debt, Lucy Carlyle is not paid for a month (160), a significant circumstance that is brushed over in the text. Had this occurred in reality, bankruptcy would have struck the agency, and the employees would have had to quit—all because of the teens’ poor judgment and impulsivity. As an individual who will soon have to take legal accountability for my own actions, my interpretation of the book does not completely agree with Stroud’s intended message that adolescent traits like impulsivity should be considered favourable. However, I still find the story thrilling and captivating, and I believe it is an accurate representation of young teenagers. Stroud’s representation of children as strong and individual entities who use their adolescent traits as tools for success is a powerful concept that is not often portrayed in the media. The books I grew up with did highlight young protagonists and heroes, but there was always an element of parental or authoritative influence. The plot either followed children who explored the world and eventually sought protection from other adults after being kept in the dark by their own guardians, like The 39 Clues, or children who fought villains with the help of their guardians, like The Copernicus Legacy. However, Stroud presents a unique counter-hegemonic plot in which the characters defy authority and use their adolescent characteristics to progress in society, creating a story that empowers young teenagers to explore themselves and the world without limitations. Like me, young readers feel validated and acknowledged by Stroud’s representation of teenagers, as they are frequently shamed in reality for acting juvenile, even though that is who they are. The Screaming Staircase’s acceptance of children appeals to younger audiences and imprints feelings of worthiness, making it an unquestionably significant recommendation for young teenagers to read.

Work Cited

“Do I Need a Legal Guardian.” Ontario International College, https://www.oicedu.ca/show.php?contentid=184. Accessed 11 December 2023.Stroud, Jonathan. Lockwood & Co.: The Screaming Staircase. EPUB, Disney Book Group, 2013